OttWatch Publishes Freedom of Information Requests

Kevin O'Donnell
2013-11-07 02:09

When, if ever, should we know what the City of Ottawa has produced in response to a access to information (ATIP) request? Immediately is one answer. Never is the current practice.

The City of Ottawa should shift to something in between, to a sweet spot where ATIP responses are released as opendata, automatically, after some delay. This would increase the public's access to public information while retaining the media's legitimate desire for short term secrecy.

Photo & Video Sharing by SmugMugIn that vein, OttWatch is now publishing the list of ATIP requests that are made to the City of Ottawa. The first batch from January to June 2013 is now online. The database contains only request summaries - not the responses. But armed with the MFIPPA number it should be easy and inexpensive to request a copy of the original response.

OttWatch posesses the ATIP request list for July and August as well, but for the moment that data will be embargoed.

The Public

What impact does this new information have on the public? Ottawa has a flourishing community of civic activists who volunteer their time in advancement of their cause. It is clear individuals are already using ATIP requests to further their goals. In March an individual filed A-2013-00196, requesting a copy of all FOI responses in 2012. Someone else is interested in flouride.

Why the data was valuable to these individuals can never be known, but it is clear that the general public can also benefit from this data now that it has been created. OttWatch will leverage the completed 2012 ATIP request to augment this very database. Lots of people have concerns about flouride in our drinking water - but not all of them would have the agency to extract information from the city.

Proactive release of ATIP responses benefits the general public by lowering barriers to participation. Some members of the public have the agency to compose, file, and pay for ATIP requests. The resulting data is likely shared within their community but can go no further. Another member of the public, advocating on the same issue, for understandable reasons may find the ATIP process too burdensome. They are now prevented from fully participating in their community, which is against their and the general public's interest.

Releasing all ATIP responses to the public would enable more people to participate, to everyone's benefit.

The Media

Journalists leverage ATIP requests to obtain information from the city that they otherwise can't get. Without a doubt its in the public's interest to support investigative journalism. If ATIP responses are published freely to everyone, does any negative impact on the media negate any other benefits to the general public? That question is why OttWatch will embargo the ATIP database for a period of time. Your thoughts on this will shape how long that time will be.

David Reevely, Ottawa Citizen, touched on incentives, competition and the need for secrecy while summarizing a different kind of oversharing problem:

short-term secrecy is essential to competition among reporters, which is what drives us to find out things that your government would rather you didn’t know.

An obvious objection to releasing ATIP responses to the public, for free, is the original requestor paid for it to be created. The cost can be low. OttWatch paid only $10 for the January to August ATIP list but abandoned an earlier $450 request

The media don't have infinite budgets to extract data from the city. Would knowing their ATIP response would be shared freely with their competitors influence their decision to file one in the first place? What if there was some delay, creating enough short term secrecy?

Conversely, the public may benefit from journalists having access to their competitors ATIP responses, eventually. In February a journalist asked for information about Ottawa's film studio endeavor. On May 5th two more requests were filed. It's possible this was one reporter filing requests at different times from different angles. Or multiple reporters were all chasing the same story.

Duplication of effort is expected in a competitive market. But at some point that duplication, due to ATIP responses remaining hidden forever, harms the public interest instead of serving it. As a whole, would journalists be able to develop stories more effectively if they could benefit from freely available ATIP responses?

This isn't limited to only their competitors requests. Might requests from the public lead to stories?

One example is A-2013-00010, filed by the government itself, for bike crash data on NCC pathways since 2005. Is there a story waiting to be told inside that data? Why did someone want traffic camera video for Terry Fox and Hazeldean for a one hour period on April 24th? Is there a story in there? Same for Campeau and March on Dec 11, 2012.

Should we set aside the media's interests when it comes to ATIP policies? David Eaves, an open-government activist and newly appointed member of Ontario's task force on Open Government, would say yes.

In "Why Journalists Should Support Putting Access to Information Requests Online Immediately" Eaves challenges the notion that access requests are primarily a tool the media uses to pry open government business, an opinion people share with him often. Instead he returns to the original purpose of access legislation:

Access to information laws were not created to give specific journalists scoops – they were designed to maximize the public’s capacity to access government information. Protecting a media company’s business model is not the role of access laws. It isn’t even in the spirit of the law.


It is in the public's interest to have ATIP responses made available so the full benefits of that data can be realized. Eaves' arguments for why the release should be immediate are compelling. The media have defensible reasons against immediate release.

Should Ottawa release ATIP data immediately, after some delay, or continue the current practice?

Look for July's MFIPPA data to be released on OttWatch in December, August's in January 2014, and so on.

comments powered by Disqus

More stories...

Development Charges Background Study, 2017 Amendment
2017-03-28 09:18:55
Ottawa Vanier by-election: live-stream November 10th, 7pm
2016-11-07 12:05:33
MFIPPA: Ottawa Police Service How-to Guide
2016-11-01 12:08:35
The market price of 60 specific park-and-ride spaces
2016-10-14 15:31:23
Part Lot Control: blocks and parcels and lots
2016-10-06 13:10:29
MFIPPA: A How-to Guide for the City of Ottawa
2016-07-15 09:05:51
Forcing the Police Board to deal with an issue
2016-05-31 11:16:34
Sparks Street Mall Authority governance review: bumpy
2016-04-18 09:49:47
Give me an ad Vasili
2016-04-01 09:00:42
Zoning inflation: the Shania Twain effect
2016-02-29 09:02:09
Information Tickle Trunk
2016-02-28 22:32:47
Public Bathroom Map for Ottawa: a howto
2016-02-19 13:17:28
Delegating to a City Committee
2016-02-03 14:09:09
Lebreton Redevelopment Story Collection
2016-01-26 09:20:44
A few of my favourite Joanne Chianello stories
2015-12-09 22:04:06
Online at last: Committee of Adjustment web presence coming in 2016
2015-11-19 10:53:01
Ottawa Centre #elxn42 Candidates Debate — Oct 1 — Livestream
2015-09-09 21:19:18
If you were a ward boundary review petition, what would you look like?
2015-07-06 09:09:09
Traffic cameras and a MFIPPA request
2015-06-18 10:38:48
City Solicitor, DCR Phoenix and over-contributions
2015-04-18 19:39:03
2014 Winners Donation Index and Audit Application Instructions
2015-04-16 15:28:58
Corporate Directory Search Crowdsourcing
2015-04-13 10:55:49
First Analysis of the 2014 Election Donation Index
2015-04-11 06:14:44
Three Thousand Two Hundred and Nineteen - Digitizing 2014 Campaign Donations
2015-04-08 09:16:04
Goodwill motions: when motions are not real motions.
2015-03-26 12:25:23
A Debate Over Five Words: and the City of Ottawa
2015-03-26 08:32:25
Reporters' Privacy and the Daily Media Call Summary
2015-03-02 14:24:27
Browse and Search the 2015 Draft Budget
2015-02-05 23:46:52
Taxi Regulation Report: Uber Late with no ETA
2015-01-24 11:00:26
Assorted By-Laws
2015-01-22 10:02:56
Postmedia's conversation with the Mayor
2014-11-07 09:25:24
Detailed #OttVote Results: 2014
2014-11-01 14:36:22
Website Screengrabs - 2014 OttVote Edition
2014-10-26 23:55:30
Ottawa Citizen #OttVote Candidate Survey - Index
2014-10-25 14:47:10
Kitchissippi All Candidates Debate Livestream
2014-10-06 13:50:32
In Support of Ottawa123 and Ranked Ballots
2014-10-03 11:53:21
OttWatch's avatar is...
2014-09-30 10:50:19
OttVote Advocacy: Find Your Ward Widget
2014-08-04 21:03:58
The Fundamentals of Municipal Finance: Seminar
2014-07-14 10:45:35
Digitizing the 2014-Q1 MFIPPA disclosure list
2014-05-05 09:41:48
Committee of Adjustment: Agendas
2014-02-03 08:54:44
Ottawa Stop Sign Requests: mapped
2014-02-02 23:16:46
Campaign Transparency: 2003 and 2006 campaign returns
2014-02-01 23:57:45
How to comment on Committee of Adjustment applications
2014-01-28 11:49:47
Donations and Maps
2014-01-23 00:40:58
Committee of Adjustment: Panel Agendas
2014-01-20 09:22:17
Minority Report
2013-12-31 09:43:29
Inside the Lobbyist Registry
2013-11-14 09:18:57
Tiny Zoning Tour
2013-11-01 02:58:52
Created by Kevin O'Donnell to make it easier to be part of the political conversation in Ottawa.
On Twitter? Follow @OttWatch and @ODonnell_K
Privacy Policy