Committee of Adjustment application
Address (Zoning) 2126 Rice (R2F)
4 Hearing (zoning unknown)
13 Hearing (zoning unknown)
Possibly related devapp(s) D08-02-14/A-00403 - coa
D08-02-15/A-00028 - coa
D08-01-15/B-00348 - coa
Agenda Excerpt

Adjourned from November 4 Hearing to January 13 Hearing
Under Section 45 of the Planning Act
To be held on Wednesday, November 4, 2015, starting at 6:30 p.m.
Ben Franklin Place, The Chamber, Main Floor, 101 Centrepointe Drive
File No.:
Legal Description:

David & Denise Fleck
2126 Rice Avenue
7 - Bay
Lot 90, Plan 232
R2F under Zoning By-law 2008-250 as amended by Zoning By-law

At its Hearing on July 2, 2014 the Committee granted a Minor Variance Application (D08-0214/A-00193) pertaining to this property, subject to the proposed construction being in
accordance with plans filed. The Owners have now filed revised plans to construct a 6.03 m x
11.95 m, one-storey addition which will include an attached garage and entranceway on the
south-west corner of their existing dwelling, as shown on plans filed with the Committee. The
existing shed located on the west side of the property is to be demolished.
In order to proceed, the Owners require the Authority of the Committee for Minor Variances from
the Zoning By-law as follows:
Under By-law 2008-250
a) To permit a reduced total combined interior side yard setback of 2.21 metres, with one
minimum yard of 0.64 metres (existing) and a proposed westerly side yard setback of
1.57 metres, whereas the By-law requires a minimum total combined interior side yard
setback of 3.0 meters, with one minimum yard no less than 1.2 metres.

Under Zoning By-law Amendment 2015-228 (Infill Development Regulations – Phase II)
b) To permit a reduced rear yard setback of 11.02 metres whereas the By-law requires the
minimum rear yard setback on lots greater than 30 metres but less than 45 metres deep
to be the greater of either the height of the building above existing average grade, or a
distance equal to the lot depth minus 22.5 metres. In this case the lot depth of 36.58
metres minus 22.5 metres equals 14.089 metres, which is greater that the building height.
THE APPLICATION indicates that the Property is not the subject of any other current
application under the Planning Act.

Date Status
2016-01-13 CoA meeting 343107

comments powered by Disqus
Created by Kevin O'Donnell to make it easier to be part of the political conversation in Ottawa.
On Twitter? Follow @OttWatch and @ODonnell_K
Privacy Policy